Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kent Langley's avatar

Hi Ethan, Good post. Saw your summary over on Linkedin. I subscribed and look forward to future pieces.

One of the things I've been trying really hard to do is post more positively. Here is an example, "The Most Vulnerable Service Verticals" could be said, "The Biggest Opportunities in Service Verticals" (sings a different tune). I just find there's enough negativity. But, of course, I also find people will click on negative stuff more than positive; oh human psychology why on why?

As I think the most vulnerable are actually were there incumbents and new entrants have the biggest opportunity to scale, innovate, and provide orders of magnitude better service to their clients faster, better, and cheaper; also delivering better profit margins than historically seen for services and an less risk as business models can also innovate.

Personally, my coaching and consultant services have been "AI Native" for quite some time so, love the post and positioning and couldn't agree more on balance!

Best,

Kent Langley

factually.substack.com

Expand full comment
Bocar Dia's avatar

Great analysis Ethan! Couple things I wonder about:

How will AI-native firms overcome the deeply embedded trust relationships that drive client retention in professional services? Even with superior results, humans often prefer known entities over better-performing strangers, especially for high-stakes advice…or sometimes it’s just execs covering their a**.

What's your view on the regulatory horizon? Professional services are heavily regulated precisely because of their societal impact. Will regulatory bodies adapt quickly enough to allow AI-native firms to operate as described, or will we see a prolonged period where regulatory uncertainty/capture creates a competitive moat for incumbents?

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts